How many AI images do you actually need a month?
Most people buy an image subscription against the month they imagine — the one where the campaign lands and the shop page gets rebuilt. The bill arrives against the month they actually had. This page is a short, honest way to work out which one you are paying for.
Count backwards, not forwards
Do not estimate what you will need. Look at what you made. Open the last six months of whatever you publish — social posts, thumbnails, product listings, slides — and count the images that were, or could have been, generated. Write down six numbers, one per month. Do not average them yet. The six numbers matter more than their average, because a subscription charges you per month, not per average. Two months of thirty and four months of zero is an average of ten and a billing reality of four wasted months.
Read the shape of the six numbers
Flat and high — every month within striking distance of the others, and most of them substantial: you are a subscription customer. The reset never costs you anything because you always consume the allowance. Buy the plan whose allowance sits just above your typical month. Spiky — a couple of big months, several near-empty ones: every near-empty month is a full-price month that delivered nothing. This is where a non-expiring pack wins, because the quiet months cost zero and the spike draws on the balance you already own. Low and flat — two or three images every month, reliably: compare the cheapest plan against a pack divided by your monthly rate. A 60-image pack at three images a month is twenty months of supply, and no plan is cheaper than not paying for nineteen of them. Zero, mostly — you do not need either. Use a free tier when something comes up.
The hidden cost nobody counts
There is a behaviour that a monthly reset produces reliably: generating images you do not need, near the end of the cycle, so the allowance is not wasted. It feels like thrift and it is the opposite. You spend attention choosing prompts for images no one asked for, you fill storage with files you will not use, and you end the month having converted money into nothing at slightly better efficiency than if you had converted it into nothing directly. If you recognise that behaviour in yourself, it is strong evidence that the container is wrong rather than the price.
A worked example
A small shop owner lists new stock irregularly. Their six months: 12, 0, 3, 0, 0, 22. Average: a bit over six. Shape: spiky. On a subscription sized for a typical month, three of those months paid full price for nothing, and the 22-image month probably exceeded the allowance anyway — the worst of both ends. With packs: a 60-image pack covers the first five months with room to spare and the remainder is still there when the 22-image month arrives. Total outlay, two packs across six months, and nothing at all spent on the months that produced nothing.
Frequently asked questions
How do I count images I have not made yet?
You do not. Count what you actually published over the last six months. Forecasts of image usage are almost always the optimistic month repeated six times.
What if my usage changes?
A pack handles that better than a plan does, because it has no commitment to unwind. If you move to heavy daily use, switch to a subscription then — your remaining balance does not expire while you decide.
Is a pack cheaper than a subscription?
Per image, usually not for heavy users. Per year, almost always for uneven users, because you pay nothing at all in the months you do not generate.
Can I try before working any of this out?
Yes. Imagepack gives you a few free generations a day with no account and no card, which is usually enough to see whether the output suits your work at all.
More guides
Other things we made
Also in English, made by the same people.
Also in English, made by the same people.
Also in English, made by the same people.
Also in English, made by the same people.